Myfxbook Track Record Verified: Meaning and Checklist

Track Record verified means the trading history displayed on Myfxbook matches the history supplied by the broker. Trading Privileges verified means the person who added the account has trading access. Neither badge identifies the robot version or guarantees future returns.

Use this checklist to examine the record, then follow two individual New Hope account examples captured on 22 October 2026. Each example keeps returns, cash movements and reported drawdown together. Open the source accounts for their current figures and verification status.

• Check the date range, latest update, equity and visible open positions.

• Read Gain and Absolute Gain separately, alongside deposits and withdrawals.

• Compare reported drawdown, chart coverage and the account conditions.

Get free access to reports and lessons

Continue with report examples and short lessons in New Hope Workspace. No software purchase is needed. The team will review your request and email you an invitation.

Already have access? Open reports · Explore New Hope PRO

Read the two verification labels separately

According to Myfxbook's verification guide, Track Record verification concerns agreement between displayed history and the history supplied through the broker's platform. Trading Privileges verification concerns the account submitter's control through trading credentials. They answer different questions; neither is a promise about future performance.

Record the account URL and the status visible on the review date. Avoid relying on a cropped image of badges with no account address. If a badge, broker name or account type is unclear, leave that field unresolved rather than filling it from a salesperson's description. An unresolved field is a request for evidence, not automatic proof of wrongdoing.

Establish what is actually visible

Public does not necessarily mean every statistic is public. Myfxbook's permissions documentation explains that the owner selects which statistics visitors can see. Check whether balances, open positions, lots and detailed history are available. A hidden field limits your analysis even when the displayed information is genuine.

Use a small evidence table. Include account type, broker and server, account currency, first available trade, latest update, selected date range, visibility restrictions and product version if the owner provides it. Keep screenshots only as dated supporting records. The live account link should remain the primary reference so you can revisit changes.

Check the window before judging the curve

A chart beginning after a difficult period answers a narrower question than a chart covering the full available record. That does not make a selected window useless: it may isolate a documented strategy change. The reader still needs to know why that date was chosen and what happened before it.

Myfxbook allows a custom start date and documents that earlier history remains available for analysis on public accounts. Look for the selected start date and review the broader period where accessible. If the robot, broker or sizing changed, record those boundaries instead of merging everything into one undifferentiated headline.

Also inspect the latest update. A once-impressive record that stopped updating does not describe the account today. Ask whether trading stopped, publishing failed, the account moved or the strategy changed. A gap needs context; a graph with no new points is not evidence that risk disappeared.

Use equity to test the story told by balance

Here is a hypothetical example with no deposits or withdrawals. An account begins at USD 10,000. Closed trades add USD 2,400, so its balance is USD 12,400. Open positions are losing USD 3,000, leaving equity of USD 9,400. A closed-profit headline of 24% and current account value 6% below the starting amount can both describe that same moment.

The purpose of this example is not to predict what the open positions will do. It is to show why the missing view matters. If equity is not available, the balance chart alone cannot resolve the uncertainty. Our balance versus equity guide develops this distinction with a report-reading workflow.

Ask how drawdown was observed

Myfxbook describes several drawdown measures, including equity observations at updates and end-of-day information. The headline statistic and drawdown chart do not use identical inputs. Read the metric definition before comparing numbers from different reports.

A further practical question is sampling. If an account updates periodically, a sharp equity dip between observations may not be represented by the points you see. Ask for the update method and interval, and compare with available platform evidence when intraday risk is central to the strategy. Do not turn an observed maximum into a claim that a worse temporary loss was impossible.

Duration matters too. Two accounts can show the same maximum percentage decline while one recovers quickly and the other remains below its prior high for months. Record the time under water alongside the depth. Both help explain what holding the strategy would have felt like.

Separate trading returns from cash movements

A deposit increases account value without creating trading profit. For example, moving an account from USD 10,000 to USD 15,000 by adding USD 5,000 does not demonstrate a 50% trading return. Withdrawals create the reverse presentation problem if readers compare only starting and ending balances.

Myfxbook's Gain documentation describes its time-weighted approach. Absolute Gain uses a different calculation tied to invested funds. Do not substitute one metric for another or reconstruct either from a single balance screenshot. State the exact measure being discussed and inspect the underlying cash movements.

Read the distribution, not only the win rate

Suppose a fictional system closes nine trades at USD 10 each and one trade at a USD 120 loss. Its 90% win rate coexists with a USD 30 loss before any costs omitted from those figures. Win rate alone does not explain the size of wins, the size of losses or what remains open.

Look at average and unusually large outcomes, holding periods, position sizes, exposure concentration and consecutive losses. Check whether position size expanded after losing trades. These questions help identify what requires further explanation; they do not establish the exact algorithm merely by looking at a history table.

Financing can also affect long-held positions. Compare the record's treatment of costs with the swap and rollover checklist. Avoid counting costs twice when the reported profit already includes them.

Compare trading conditions before comparing percentages

Two real accounts may use the same named robot but differ in version, presets, symbols, contract sizes, account mode, broker execution and risk allocation. Those differences can matter more than the product name. A demo account can be useful for workflow checks but is not interchangeable evidence of live execution.

Build a comparison row for each account rather than averaging incompatible results. If a result relies on separate same-symbol positions, confirm the hedging or netting model. If orders are rejected or delayed on your account, investigate that evidence before expecting the same sequence of trades.

Turn the review into five specific questions

1. Which robot version, presets and symbols produced the displayed period?

2. Was sizing changed, and are the change dates documented?

3. Can current equity, open exposure and complete available history be reviewed?

4. What explains any publishing gaps or account replacement?

5. Which broker and execution differences would matter for my intended setup?

Keep answers as confirmed, missing or not comparable. Avoid a numerical score that makes five minor confirmations cancel one major unknown. When operational reliability is relevant, add the restart and recovery checklist: a performance chart rarely explains how a robot behaves after an interrupted connection.

Worked review: two individual New Hope account reports

Snapshot reviewed on 22 October 2026. The examples below use two individual public Myfxbook accounts, not a combined portfolio. They were selected to explain how to read cash movements, return measures and risk. They are not a representative sample of New Hope users, a ranking of brokers or a forecast. Open each source account to check whether its figures have changed.

Open full-size graphic

Original Myfxbook charts captured on 22 October 2026. Sources: A — IC Markets and B — ExclusiveMarkets. The chart scales and historical windows differ; the displayed curves are not full-year records. Open the individual reports for current details.

The displayed leverage is an account characteristic, not a recommendation. The two green verification indicators concern history matching and account control, as explained in Myfxbook’s verification documentation. They do not establish a particular robot version or prove that every trade was generated by it.

Account A: reconcile the balance before interpreting the return

The IC Markets report shows deposits of USD 10,994.34, profit of USD 27,479.72 and withdrawals of USD 38,470.00. Its remaining balance and equity are both USD 4.06. These numbers allow a useful check:

USD 10,994.34 + USD 27,479.72 − USD 38,470.00 = USD 4.06.

The cash totals reconcile to the displayed balance. A nearly empty ending account is therefore not, by itself, evidence that the published profit was lost: recorded withdrawals explain this ending balance. Equally, the withdrawal total includes capital as well as trading profit. Calling the entire USD 38,470 “profit” would be incorrect. The public totals do not establish where the money went after withdrawal.

The report separately displays commissions of −USD 12,693.03. Record that field when examining costs; do not automatically subtract it from the reported profit a second time. Here the published deposit, profit and withdrawal totals already reconcile. Use the detailed broker statement to establish how individual cost entries were treated.

Check what the curve can actually show

The four visible growth points for account A are 0% on 6 March, 0.64% on 16 March, −5.44% on 17 March and 249.94% on 19 March; a withdrawal is shown on 20 March. A line connecting four observations cannot explain every intervening equity movement. Nor does the last-update label of 21 August turn March trading into an eight-month trading record. Keep chart dates, transaction dates and publication updates separate.

Myfxbook’s drawdown documentation also distinguishes the headline figure from the drawdown chart: intraday observations contribute to the headline but are not all represented in that chart. Read the displayed 18.74% as a reported historical measure, not a maximum loss that cannot be exceeded.

Account B: a larger Gain is not the same comparison

ExclusiveMarkets displays 820.69% Gain alongside 84.21% Absolute Gain and 82.24% drawdown. All three belong in the same review. Its cash check is USD 4,484.14 deposits + USD 3,776.21 profit − USD 8,260.35 withdrawals = USD 0.00 balance. For this snapshot, profit divided by total deposits is approximately 84.21%, matching the displayed Absolute Gain; it does not reproduce the 820.69% Gain.

Myfxbook calculates Gain using a time-weighted method; its Absolute Gain documentation describes a different measure that does not preserve the timing of cash movements. The arithmetic above is a snapshot cross-check, not a universal reconstruction of either metric. We cannot explain the full gap from headline totals alone: trade-level balances and the cash-flow sequence matter.

Account B’s 82.24% reported drawdown represents substantial historical risk. Its larger Gain and slightly higher profit factor do not establish a better or more suitable setup. Continue reviewing this metric with our forex drawdown guide. Both accounts showed a Live Update warning when inspected. A recent refresh is not proof of recent trading, and a verification badge should not be described as confirmation of live, continuously updating performance.

Continue the review in New Hope Workspace

In New Hope Workspace, open Results for report links and viewing instructions. Where trading-account observation is included in your assigned access, the team will provide current connection details and instructions in your workspace so you can examine history and open positions in read-only mode.

If report terminology is new to you, start with free learning in New Hope Workspace. The article shows the basic lessons, PRO and Crypto simulators and report-reading exercises. No software purchase is needed for the lessons; Workspace access is provided by invitation.

For New Hope PRO, ask which account, software release and conditions match your intended setup. These forex reports are not evidence of New Hope Crypto performance. If exploring crypto, use the POC, VAH and VAL practical guide for the concepts, then request a relevant report. In either case, check the difference between balance and equity before drawing a conclusion from a headline return.

Review New Hope reports with the same standard

Open the New Hope reports page and apply the same questions to each available record. This article does not certify the present badge status or performance of every linked account. Check the account itself at the time of your review.

If you are considering New Hope PRO, discuss the intended broker, instrument and setup with the team and ask which record is relevant to those conditions. A useful conversation begins with a specific comparison and documented limitations, rather than the largest percentage on a chart. Historical observations can inform that conversation; they cannot guarantee the next result.